Defending Hungary at the River Don? - By Karl Pfeifer

The Hungarian Government will erect a monument in the centre of Budapest commemorating the German occupation of the country on March 19 th 1944. A few weeks later another Holocaust-museum will open in the capital. The government is keen on giving the appearance - mainly abroad - that Hungary is a democratic country like all other EU-states.
But believing that one can say things in Hungarian for domestic use which are not noted outside its borders, high-level representatives give speeches which (like many other things this government does) do breach the basic values of the EU.
In January 1943 the Red Army attacked the second Hungarian army at the shores of the Don and destroyed it. Many of the badly equipped 200'000 soldiers lost their lives. On the 71 st anniversary of the Soviet "Break-through at the Don" Tamás Vargha, Undersecretary of the Defence Department, stated in a public speech that "the General Staff of the time said it loud and clear: participation in the war has to be avoided."
This is a crude falsification. Nothing forced Hungary to enter the attack against the Soviet Union and the then Chief of the General Staff Henrik Werth rather suggested to Prime Minister Bárdossy on June 14 th 1941 in writing that Hungary should indeed take part in the German attack [to get a part of the spoils], which proved to be a catastrophic miscalculation.
To quote Vargha further: "Many, tens of thousands of Hungarian soldiers became casualties on the Don, yet these Hungarians on the wide Russian battlefields did not fight and die for foreign interests, but in defence of their homeland."
This sort of revisionist thinking usually propagated by right wing extremists is now voiced by representative government politicians, while their colleagues insist - mainly abroad - on the huge difference between the right wing "Jobbik" and the "conservative" Fidesz-KDNP.

The article was published in German on